Miramar Beach, Florida – The hottest subject during dry Spring meetings this week is not the future of the University football Format of the playoffs, according to his most eminent football coach.
This is not the imminent regulation of the NCAA c. House, and what is happening once the sharing of income comes into force.
It is not if the dry should spend nine conference games, a debate that has been raging for years during this annual event without resolution.
According to CBS Sports’ University football coach n ° 1The most important problem is the transfer portal window. And the frustration of Kirby Smart offers a window on the reasons why the dry – and the other Power Quatre lectures – are so eager to take more control over the Governance process of the NCAA, if not completely break the NCAA, To pass a common sense transfer reform.
“The biggest decision that must be made in university football at the moment is by far when the portal window is and is it one or two,” said Smart. “It is not decided by us today. Many people do not even know how it is decided and who decides it.”
Dry coaches like Smart Want Want Portal reduced admissibility of two windows (winter and spring) to one and to reduce the overall number of available transfer portal days. Currently, the portal periods take place from December 9 to 28 and from April 16 to 25. The period in December is particularly embarrassing for coaches who must balance the early signature period, the transfer portal and the preparation of their teams for matters in the playoffs.
Slow changes
There are mixed opinions on the dates and the length for a singular gate window – more on this subject later – but that has not yet occurred despite a general approval among the Power Four coaches.
During the meetings of the American Football Coaches Association in January, the group voted to approve a single portal window. AFCA executive director Craig Bohl told CBS Sports that a window would benefit the two players looking to maximize their value and coaches looking for more consistency.
“We support one and we think it’s just and that will give players and coaches more stability,” said Bohl.
However, the push window for a transfer portal is not a new development. Last year, the NCAA football surveillance committee even recommended eliminating the spring transfer window.
So why didn’t it happen? It is at the heart of the frustration of the SEC Commissioner, Greg Sankey, with a structure of the NCAA which do not be power four conferences with the regulatory authority that their stature and their wealth seem to justify.
The study reveals that elite recruits see a drop in project ratings after the transfer
Chris Hummer
A weighted vote
Currently, Power Four’s conferences are pressure for a weighted vote which would give them 65% of the power on rule committees. Even this amount, which would give power four conferences much more power than they have now, is always accompanied by the risk. A high -ranking source said that everything you need is that a conference does not vote with others – or even cease to exist completely if there is additional realignment and consolidation – to avoid approval of solutions. Sankey said on Monday that he would like to see that weighted voting will increase to 68% to avoid some of these problems.
Several Big Ten and Dry sources have expressed extreme frustration for CBS sports not to be able to push changes because small conferences do not support it. The situation of the transfer portal was particularly frustrating that conferences that would apparently benefit from not having a spring transfer portal window does not take place simply because the dry and others want it. The representatives of the dry on these committees presented these arguments in vain, according to sources. When you have conferences that have not hesitated to fully finance the ceiling of $ 20.5 million and others that will not spend a dollar for sharing voting income on the same questions, you can see how it can turn quickly.
The success of the dry, in particular, seemed to harm its ability to make rules change when small conferences question its motivations.
“It is really difficult to play in a championship framework and to have to face it, but when I raised it as a complaint or a problem, it was said to me:” There are no crying of the yacht “,” said Smart. “If you are going to play in these environments, you must be willing to do so. Now we cannot do that.”
Smart believes that the implementation committee, which includes two sports directors of each power conference, will finally have spoken on the transfer portal.
Texas A & M The sports director Trev Alberts, one of the two advertisements of the SEC on the committee, believes that there are several stages which must occur before the windows of the transfer portal become the primordial question. Before the committee could consider resolving it, the regulations must first be approved and the new entity of the college sports committee must be operational, which will include the hiring of a chief executive.
“Of course, the coaches, the first thing on their list is the transfer portal and the calendar, and that makes sense,” said Alberts on Tuesday. “But none of this is important if we cannot do all of this here first. I think there is a logical sequence.”
ALABAMA KALEN DEBOER CAUTER CAUTION on the calendar of nine dry games, questions CFP implications
Cody Nagel
The future of the portal window
Even if the four power conferences get all the necessary entities on board to move to a single gate window, this will create another sticky problem. Smart pressure for a January transfer window. Oklahoma Brent Venable coach prefers February because “this is one of the slowest moments of the season”. Unlike professional leagues, however, university football still has to face academic schedules that could make the transfer of athletes difficult and be admitted to new schools in the midst of a university semester.
Smart would like to see a transfer portal leaving in December, but it is most concerned about the only window that occurs in the spring. THE Georgia The coach said that there was an increasing contingency that grows for the portal window to pass in April, with at least a few Big Ten coaches on board with this idea.
“If you think that falsification is a problem, put this portal in April and see what the teams do in January, February and March,” said Smart. “Think now. We are preparing to make a big decision and many people believe that a child will not be able to leave if we put it in April, they will have to remain the next semester. Oh no, they will be on your campus, which will be falsified, collecting 33% of your cap before leaving with it. I am not for that.”
Smart’s comments show how powerful people are still at the mercy of a bureaucratic system long expected for a change. Obtaining consensus on any problem has never been so difficult. Like apparently all the problems that university sports are confronted at the moment, There are prosecution problems If they eliminate the portal windows and seem to restrict the player’s movement.
If you are wondering why the dry and the others are so determined to fight against the control of more of the NCAA decision -making device, the debate on the transfer portal is such a simple example.
Brandon Marcello of CBS Sports contributed to this report.
