Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    Justin Jefferson says Vikings would have been better last season with Sam Darnold at QB

    February 1, 2026

    Super Bowl 60 Player Ratings: New England Patriots

    January 31, 2026

    Mike Macdonald and Mike Vrabel are the first Super Bowl defensive head coaches in 7 years

    January 31, 2026

    Iowa’s Sean Welsh Remains Open and Unafraid About His Depression

    January 31, 2026

    Analysis of the Packers: passive or active defenses

    January 31, 2026
  • NBA

    Trending Topics: Will Thunder repeat as champions in 2025-2026?

    February 1, 2026

    NBA results and rankings: Jokic comes back strong, Dončić achieves a triple-double

    February 1, 2026

    Boozer’s 24 points lift No. 4 Duke to 72-58 victory over Virginia Tech

    January 31, 2026

    Elena Rybakina upsets Aryna Sabalenka to win Australian Open 2026 final: Live updates and reaction

    January 31, 2026

    NBA Roundup: Nikola Jokic’s return pushes Nuggets past Clippers

    January 31, 2026
  • NHL

    Hartman suspended 3 games for actions in Wild game

    February 1, 2026

    Martin Necas sidelined with lower body injury

    January 31, 2026

    NHL 26 Deluxe Edition will feature the Tkachuk family on the cover

    January 31, 2026

    “Heated Rivalry inspired me to come out as gay”

    January 31, 2026

    LA Kings announce theme nights and promotional games 2024-25

    January 31, 2026
  • MLB

    Do the St. Louis Cardinals really need Ivan Herrera at receiver?

    February 1, 2026

    Yankees Day Anniversary: ​​Duke Maas

    January 31, 2026

    Question of the day: A surprise 3-4 win season, which player would transform the Mariners’ season?

    January 31, 2026

    White Sox announce 2026 promotional schedule at SoxFest

    January 31, 2026

    Former Yankee David Robertson announces retirement from baseball

    January 30, 2026
  • Soccer

    Real Madrid’s theme park looks fake, but it’s real

    February 1, 2026

    Juventus nearing swap deal with Bologna for Emil Holm

    January 31, 2026

    women’s national football teams 2025 | Statist

    January 31, 2026

    Every Manchester City game now seems huge. Can this City team handle the pressure?

    January 31, 2026

    Highest revenue football clubs 2025 | Statist

    January 31, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

Real Madrid’s theme park looks fake, but it’s real

February 1, 2026

Juventus nearing swap deal with Bologna for Emil Holm

January 31, 2026

women’s national football teams 2025 | Statist

January 31, 2026

Every Manchester City game now seems huge. Can this City team handle the pressure?

January 31, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

Day by day during Speedweeks at Daytona International Speedway

February 1, 2026

Trending Topics: Will Thunder repeat as champions in 2025-2026?

February 1, 2026

Kentucky basketball holds on to beat Arkansas, John Calipari on the road

February 1, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.