Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    NFL doesn’t expect proposed ban on pushing this offseason after years of criticism and controversy

    February 23, 2026

    Jaguars take another page from Rams playbook

    February 22, 2026

    Javonte Williams deal highlights realities of running back market

    February 22, 2026

    Minnesota Vikings wide receiver Rondale Moore dies at 25

    February 22, 2026

    49ers offensive lineman had worst pressure rate at position in 2025

    February 21, 2026
  • NBA

    NBA Scores: Short-handed Warriors shock Nikola Jokić and Nuggets

    February 23, 2026

    Nikola Topic shines in NBA debut after 600-day recovery journey

    February 22, 2026

    NBA scores: Suns vs Magic, Knicks vs Rockets and other games

    February 22, 2026

    Celtics vs Lakers Prediction, Picks and Odds for Tonight’s NBA Game

    February 22, 2026

    NBA results and rankings: Wemby dominates the Kings

    February 22, 2026
  • NHL

    Crosby is training with Team Canada and could play in the gold medal game against the United States

    February 23, 2026

    2026 Olympics: the United States is gold and other thoughts

    February 22, 2026

    Lehkonen’s father missed Olympic goal in overtime while broadcasting a different game

    February 22, 2026

    ‘Amazing’ Connor Hellebuyck doesn’t let NHL playoff woes get him down at Olympics

    February 22, 2026

    Justin Bieber skips Met Gala to watch Maple Leafs in game 1

    February 22, 2026
  • MLB

    World Baseball Classic Prediction: Japan is the smart choice in prediction markets like Kalshi

    February 23, 2026

    ST Game 3: Los Angeles Dodgers vs. San Diego Padres

    February 22, 2026

    Build a historic Cleveland Baseball starting lineup for 1 game

    February 22, 2026

    Defensive Improvement – Yahoo Sports

    February 22, 2026

    White Sox report card is all A’s, 11-2

    February 22, 2026
  • Soccer

    Champions qualified on penalties, Paulistão semi-finals confirmed

    February 23, 2026

    Freese or Turner? Debate over US men’s goaltending at Gold Cup is a hot topic

    February 22, 2026

    Doubts over Luciano Spalletti’s long-term future at Juventus

    February 22, 2026

    Roig discusses Alex Baena’s market situation, a hot topic on Barca’s agenda

    February 22, 2026

    ⚠️ RB Bragantino confirms defender will be punished after sexist comments

    February 22, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

Champions qualified on penalties, Paulistão semi-finals confirmed

February 23, 2026

Freese or Turner? Debate over US men’s goaltending at Gold Cup is a hot topic

February 22, 2026

Doubts over Luciano Spalletti’s long-term future at Juventus

February 22, 2026

Roig discusses Alex Baena’s market situation, a hot topic on Barca’s agenda

February 22, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

NFL doesn’t expect proposed ban on pushing this offseason after years of criticism and controversy

February 23, 2026

Crosby is training with Team Canada and could play in the gold medal game against the United States

February 23, 2026

Champions qualified on penalties, Paulistão semi-finals confirmed

February 23, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.