Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    Joe Burrow added to AFC Pro Bowl roster

    February 2, 2026

    A game for the Packers to steal the Seahawks

    February 1, 2026

    The Patriots from “Home” chose white jerseys to perpetuate the “Road Warriors” atmosphere

    February 1, 2026

    NFL, ESPN Officially Reach Massive Deal With Government Approval; the league now owns 10% of the network

    February 1, 2026

    Justin Jefferson says Vikings would have been better last season with Sam Darnold at QB

    February 1, 2026
  • NBA

    January 30, 2026 – winners and losers

    February 2, 2026

    NASCAR Clash postponed until Wednesday due to historic snowfall in North Carolina

    February 1, 2026

    Dallas Mavericks vs Houston Rockets January 31, 2026 Box Scores – NBA

    February 1, 2026

    OKC Thunder excited to add Nikola topic next season

    February 1, 2026

    NBA leaders: Kansas’ Peterson, BYU’s Dybantsa are draft’s top prospects

    February 1, 2026
  • NHL

    Olympic hockey in Milan will be played on shorter ice than the NHL

    February 2, 2026

    Why Tom Willander deserves more ice time with the Vancouver Canucks

    February 1, 2026

    Hot NHL Topics: Panarin Destinations, Doughty’s Recent Play and More

    February 1, 2026

    Wild beat Oilers 7-3, Hughes sets franchise record

    February 1, 2026

    Hartman suspended 3 games for actions in Wild game

    February 1, 2026
  • MLB

    Suarez to Reds: $1/15M, according to reports

    February 2, 2026

    Athletics Community Prospects List: Bolte Finds Place at No. 6

    February 1, 2026

    Are you more optimistic about the twins’ future after Derek Falvey’s departure?

    February 1, 2026

    Braves News: Framber Valdez Rumors, Player Panels, More

    February 1, 2026

    Do the St. Louis Cardinals really need Ivan Herrera at receiver?

    February 1, 2026
  • Soccer

    Steven James Naoum denies choking his child during a football match in Mindarie

    February 2, 2026

    Thomas Frank reaction — What did the Spurs manager say about the incredible comeback draw against Manchester City?

    February 1, 2026

    Football history project reveals details of Australia’s first women’s football match

    February 1, 2026

    Manchester City vs Tottenham: Latest City injury news and City starting XI predictions

    February 1, 2026

    Real Madrid’s theme park looks fake, but it’s real

    February 1, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

Steven James Naoum denies choking his child during a football match in Mindarie

February 2, 2026

Thomas Frank reaction — What did the Spurs manager say about the incredible comeback draw against Manchester City?

February 1, 2026

Football history project reveals details of Australia’s first women’s football match

February 1, 2026

Manchester City vs Tottenham: Latest City injury news and City starting XI predictions

February 1, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

Cup Veteran Issues Humble 4-Word Plea to Sponsors Amid NASCAR Star PowerCrisis

February 2, 2026

RJ Barrett scores 21 points in Raptors’ 107-100 win over Jazz

February 2, 2026

Why Jeremiah Love’s Stats Say He Deserves the 8th Pick

February 2, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.