Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    Seahawks release first injury report of Super Bowl week

    February 5, 2026

    Kyle Brandt provides the ultimate conversation starter for Super Bowl LX parties | ‘GMFB’ – NFL.com

    February 4, 2026

    Should the Saints bring back Alontae Taylor?

    February 4, 2026

    Is the evil empire back? How the Patriots Rebuilt a Shattered Dynasty

    February 4, 2026

    How the British coach went from amateur play to the Super Bowl

    February 4, 2026
  • NBA

    Are the Boston Celtics done trading?

    February 5, 2026

    Anthony Davis moved from Mavericks to Wizards, capping fallout from Luka Dončić deal: sources

    February 5, 2026

    A&M great Khris Middleton is now a Maverick

    February 4, 2026

    Every NBA All-Star Game winner, result and score – NBC Los Angeles

    February 4, 2026

    Thunder Rookie Makes NBA History For Doing Nothing

    February 4, 2026
  • NHL

    Stadium Series field design will have a pirate theme for Bruins-Lightning

    February 5, 2026

    Bruins vs. Panthers prediction, picks and best bet for tonight’s NHL game

    February 4, 2026

    NHL EDGE leads stats for 2025-26 season

    February 4, 2026

    Gauthier scores his 25th goal and the Ducks beat Kraken 4-2 to move closer to the Pacific Division lead

    February 4, 2026

    2026 Stadium Series in Tampa to adopt Gasparilla Pirate Fest theme

    February 4, 2026
  • MLB

    Non-roster invitees for the 2026 Arizona Diamondbacks, Part 2

    February 5, 2026

    Former Blue Jays outfielder Teoscar Hernandez has become the subject of trade talks

    February 4, 2026

    Michael Siani finds his way back to the Dodgers

    February 4, 2026

    Batting Around: Does MLB Need a Salary Cap?

    February 3, 2026

    St. Louis Cardinals Reader’s Mailbag – February 2026

    February 3, 2026
  • Soccer

    More questions than answers as Newcastle yet to catch fire

    February 5, 2026

    Injured Liverpool star may not return until 2027

    February 4, 2026

    Football will never be a dominant sport in America

    February 4, 2026

    Is Manchester City vs Newcastle on TV? Channel, kick-off time and how to watch the Carabao Cup semi-final

    February 4, 2026

    Newcastle Jets beat semi-pro Heidelberg United 3-1 to win their first Australian Cup

    February 4, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

More questions than answers as Newcastle yet to catch fire

February 5, 2026

Injured Liverpool star may not return until 2027

February 4, 2026

Football will never be a dominant sport in America

February 4, 2026

Is Manchester City vs Newcastle on TV? Channel, kick-off time and how to watch the Carabao Cup semi-final

February 4, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

Denny Hamlin to compete in 2026 NASCAR season despite shoulder injury, family tragedy

February 5, 2026

Are the Boston Celtics done trading?

February 5, 2026

Michigan State basketball shocked by lowly Minnesota after flat effort

February 5, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.