Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    49ers offensive lineman had worst pressure rate at position in 2025

    February 21, 2026

    Zach Charbonnet Undergoes Surgery to Repair ACL Tear

    February 21, 2026

    Bengals keep free agency and NFL draft options open: OBI podcast

    February 21, 2026

    Several teams ‘willing to talk’ about Dolphins star player trades

    February 21, 2026

    Cowboys cut LB Logan Wilson

    February 20, 2026
  • NBA

    Kon Knueppel scores 33 points against the Cleveland Cavaliers – NBA

    February 21, 2026

    Status of injured Canadian captain Sidney Crosby uncertain for Olympic gold medal game

    February 21, 2026

    Luka Doncic drops 38 points as Los Angeles Lakers edge Los Angeles Clippers 125-122 in Thriller

    February 21, 2026

    OKC Thunder PG Nikola Topic makes NBA debut 4 months after cancer diagnosis

    February 21, 2026

    NBA results and ranking: Gobert risks suspension, Topic gets back on track

    February 21, 2026
  • NHL

    The Canadiens’ schedule will be a big challenge

    February 21, 2026

    Fantasy Rankings for Milan Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics

    February 21, 2026

    Arshdeep Bains sets new all-time points record for Abbotsford Canucks

    February 21, 2026

    Fiala to miss remainder of Kings regular season with leg fractures

    February 21, 2026

    Report: Insider believes Jordan Kyrou won’t be with St. Louis Blues in 2026-27

    February 20, 2026
  • MLB

    White Sox report card is all A’s, 11-2

    February 22, 2026

    Braves News: Spring training opens, FanDuel Sports Network and more

    February 21, 2026

    Padres’ Yuki Matsui’s WBC status with Japan in question due to groin issue

    February 21, 2026

    Michael Arroyo shines as Mariners win spring training opener against Padres, 7-4

    February 21, 2026

    List of longest-tenured Dodgers enters new era

    February 20, 2026
  • Soccer

    From death row to defense: football behind bars

    February 21, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: Chelsea name starting XI for Burnley PL clash

    February 21, 2026

    Cricket and football star Ellyse Perry talks about keeping perspective

    February 21, 2026

    UWCL: Man United beat Atletico Madrid to reach quarter-finals

    February 21, 2026

    Several local players win all-state football…

    February 20, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

From death row to defense: football behind bars

February 21, 2026

🚨 BREAKING: Chelsea name starting XI for Burnley PL clash

February 21, 2026

Cricket and football star Ellyse Perry talks about keeping perspective

February 21, 2026

UWCL: Man United beat Atletico Madrid to reach quarter-finals

February 21, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

White Sox report card is all A’s, 11-2

February 22, 2026

NCAA basketball teams at Climate Pledge Arena

February 21, 2026

Where LSU football’s Jayden Daniels ranks in ESPN’s CFB QB rankings

February 21, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.