Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    Packers named to NFLPA executive committee

    March 16, 2026

    The Rams should have an easier time shopping Davante Adams now

    March 15, 2026

    Trent McDuffie: The Rams goal that got me is the Lombardi Trophy

    March 15, 2026

    Cleveland Browns news (3/15): It’s time to negotiate in NFL free agency

    March 15, 2026

    Eagles reportedly interested in Darnell Mooney before signing with Giants

    March 15, 2026
  • NBA

    NBA results and ranking: Deni Avdija scores 25 points in defeat

    March 16, 2026

    Nikola Topic Puts Together Two Impressive Plays for OKC Blue

    March 16, 2026

    NBA Scores: Thunder uses balanced offense to earn 8th straight win, beat Timberwolves 116-103 – Toronto Star

    March 16, 2026

    Who refused the NIT offer? Full list of teams to be withdrawn from the tournament

    March 15, 2026

    LIVE NBA scores today for Nuggets vs Lakers March 14, 2026

    March 15, 2026
  • NHL

    The week ahead: Evgeni Malkin (and maybe Sidney Crosby) back for the Penguins

    March 16, 2026

    Rielly suspended five matches | NHL.com

    March 16, 2026

    Haydn Fleury ends two-year drought as Jets beat Blues 3-2

    March 15, 2026

    Dylan Larkin’s move after winning gold quickly became the biggest story in hockey – Detroit Hockey Insider

    March 15, 2026

    Montreal faces Anaheim in a non-conference game

    March 15, 2026
  • MLB

    Non-roster invitees for the 2026 Arizona Diamondbacks, Part 8

    March 16, 2026

    George Klassen exits with shoulder problem

    March 15, 2026

    Final week of Dodgers spring training in Arizona

    March 15, 2026

    Padres Reacts Survey Results: Walker Buehler is fans’ top pick to win fifth rotation spot

    March 15, 2026

    Despite a strong first start for the Washington Nationals, Zack Littell wants more from himself

    March 14, 2026
  • Soccer

    Fifth member of Iranian women’s football team leaves Australia

    March 16, 2026

    📹 Vasco president confronts referee and police use pepper spray

    March 16, 2026

    What’s next for Dowman: how to care for a valuable talent?

    March 15, 2026

    Real Madrid academy star reveals how he felt on dream Bernabeu debut: ‘I’m speechless’

    March 15, 2026

    Turf problem delays use of GJHS baseball, football and lacrosse fields | Western Colorado

    March 15, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

Fifth member of Iranian women’s football team leaves Australia

March 16, 2026

📹 Vasco president confronts referee and police use pepper spray

March 16, 2026

What’s next for Dowman: how to care for a valuable talent?

March 15, 2026

Real Madrid academy star reveals how he felt on dream Bernabeu debut: ‘I’m speechless’

March 15, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

The week ahead: Evgeni Malkin (and maybe Sidney Crosby) back for the Penguins

March 16, 2026

Fifth member of Iranian women’s football team leaves Australia

March 16, 2026

At Indian Wells, Aryna Sabalenka conquered her ghosts to turn heartbreak into triumph

March 16, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.