Close Menu
Sportstalk
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sportstalk
  • NFL

    Drake Maye remained a full participant in practice Thursday

    February 6, 2026

    Super Bowl 60 Picks, Silver and Black Pride Pick’em Contest

    February 5, 2026

    Random Ramsdom: Would they be interested in this backup?

    February 5, 2026

    NFL: Andy Reid responds to referee controversy in favor of the Chiefs

    February 5, 2026

    Seahawks release first injury report of Super Bowl week

    February 5, 2026
  • NBA

    Kenrich Williams Discusses Nikola Topic’s Future With OKC Thunder

    February 6, 2026

    Celtics acquire Nikola Vucevic – NBA

    February 6, 2026

    Nets reportedly waive Cam Thomas once trade deadline passes

    February 5, 2026

    Castrol Rising Stars 2026: list, provisional results, date and operation

    February 5, 2026

    NBA results and rankings: Wembanyama lifts the Spurs against an exhausted Thunder

    February 5, 2026
  • NHL

    Islanders announce 2025-2026 theme night program – The Hockey News

    February 6, 2026

    Latvia’s Alberts Smits and other players to watch in underdog teams at Milan Olympics

    February 5, 2026

    Linus Ullmark’s case is now a much bigger concern after the Ottawa Senators recalled two goalies from the AHL on Friday

    February 5, 2026

    Recap: Artturi Lehkonen scores twice in 4-2 win over Sharks

    February 5, 2026

    Stadium Series field design will have a pirate theme for Bruins-Lightning

    February 5, 2026
  • MLB

    Hot Topics From Orioles 2026 Spring Training

    February 6, 2026

    FanGraphs has high expectations for the 2026 Braves

    February 5, 2026

    Yahoo Fantasy Baseball: MLB’s Hottest Topic Is Spin Rate

    February 5, 2026

    Tigers and pitcher Framber Valdez reportedly agree to 3-year, $115 million deal

    February 5, 2026

    Non-roster invitees for the 2026 Arizona Diamondbacks, Part 2

    February 5, 2026
  • Soccer

    Ninja A-League Roundup: Brisbane Roar closes gap on Melbourne City in latest drama

    February 6, 2026

    China recruits preschools to achieve Xi Jinping’s ambitious soccer superpower goal by 2050

    February 5, 2026

    Cologne youth team breaks record with 50,000 spectators

    February 5, 2026

    Spanish football starlet dies of heart attack

    February 5, 2026

    More questions than answers as Newcastle yet to catch fire

    February 5, 2026
  • More
    • Nascar
    • Golf
    • NCAA Basketball
    • NCAA Football
    • Tennis
    • WNBA
Sportstalk
Home»Soccer»France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières
Soccer

France’s highest court upholds hijab ban in women’s football as politicians take up issue | Marie Dhumières

Kevin SmythBy Kevin SmythMarch 3, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
2023 06 30 07 02 15 849840.jpg
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Paris, France

France’s highest administrative court on Thursday upheld a ban on female footballers wearing Islamic hijabs, after politicians took up the issue, saying secularism was in danger.

“Sports federations whose mission is to ensure the proper functioning of public services (…) may impose a requirement of neutrality on their players during competitions and sporting events, to guarantee the smooth running of matches and possible clashes or clashes”, indicated the Constitutional Council in a press release. .

She ruled that a rule from the French Football Federation (FFF) banning “any sign or clothing clearly showing a political, philosophical, religious or trade union affiliation” during the match was “appropriate and proportionate”.

A group of Muslim footballers called the “Hijabeuses” had launched the action against the FFF regulations.

The FFF simply indicated that it had “taken note” of the judgment, adding that the sporting body “reaffirms the republican and civic values ​​which keep football alive, as well as its total commitment to the fight against all forms of discrimination and in favor of gender equality. .

Marion Ogier, lawyer for the “Hijabeuses”, declared that this decision “upends secularism and freedom of expression” and “abuses 30 years of jurisprudence” on the issue.

“This decision goes against social cohesion in a country founded on diversity and pluralism,” she told AFP.

The judges found themselves under political pressure ahead of the ruling, as major parties sought to push the far right back to the top of the polls.

Secularism is a sensitive subject in France, presented by its defenders as a means of guaranteeing the religious neutrality of the State and by its critics as a whistle against ethnic and religious minorities, particularly Muslims.

Monday’s boost to “hijabes,” when the state’s legal counsel concluded the rule was unjustified, sparked a wave of political condemnation.

Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin, a supporter of the hard line in terms of maintaining order, declared Tuesday: “I deeply hope for the republic that (judges) respect neutrality on sports fields. »

The “Hijabeuses” hoped to give “blows” to the republic, Darmanin added.

“You shouldn’t wear religious clothing when you play sports… when you play football, you don’t need to know the religion of the person in front of you,” he said.

Other voices from the conservative Les Républicains party and the far-right National Rally were also heard.

Far-right leader Marine Le Pen wrote on Twitter: “No to hijab in sport. And we will pass a law so that it is respected.”

Republican leader Eric Ciotti said his party, which holds only 62 seats in the 577-seat French parliament, would present a bill on the subject if the court allowed the wearing of the hijab.

Sports Minister Amélie Oudea-Castera also suggested that Macron’s government could legislate, saying that “we are not excluding anything” and “we see that there is a need for clarification.”

The Constitutional Council itself responded on Wednesday against what it describes as “attacks targeting administrative power and in particular the legal advisor”.

Calling into question the functioning of justice constitutes “an attack on an institution essential to democracy”, added the body, estimating that it could initiate legal proceedings in the event of “insult, defamation, incitement to hatred or threats”.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
kevinsmyth
Kevin Smyth

Related Posts

Ninja A-League Roundup: Brisbane Roar closes gap on Melbourne City in latest drama

February 6, 2026

China recruits preschools to achieve Xi Jinping’s ambitious soccer superpower goal by 2050

February 5, 2026

Cologne youth team breaks record with 50,000 spectators

February 5, 2026

Spanish football starlet dies of heart attack

February 5, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest

Tyler Reddick pressed on contract status after NASCAR scraps 23XI charter

February 6, 2026

Kenrich Williams Discusses Nikola Topic’s Future With OKC Thunder

February 6, 2026

Nimari Burnett’s career-high 31 points help Michigan contend against Penn State

February 6, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news from sportstalk

Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
Hot Categories
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • Soccer
We are social
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • TikTok

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest Sports news from sportstalk

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
© 2026 Copyright 2023 Sports Talk. All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.